Sightings: A Different Side of Chabad

| | Comments (0)

In his latest Sightings column, religion scholar Martin Marty discusses recent controversial comments made by a popular Chabad rabbi on the treatment of Arabs.

Sightings 6/15/09

A Different Side of Chabad
-- Martin E. Marty

Whenever I stroll down "my" Michigan Avenue in Chicago I pass forlorn pickets in front of the now forlorn-looking Congress Hotel. After six years I had never understood why this union is picketing this hotel. This week's Forward (June 11) cleared the matter up with a front-page plus two-page story: "Long Strike at Chicago Hotel Pits Jew against Jew." The owner and the union leaders are both Jewish, and argue their respective cases religiously.

If that issue is not sufficient to show that religious arguments cannot help but surface in Forward, a left-of-center English-language heir (b. 1990) to Forverts, a Yiddish paper of once-militant socialist and consistently secular bent, a page-through of this current and typical issue should illustrate a thesis we hold hereabouts. It is that, lurking behind most communal controversies in our culture(s), religion persists as a force for good or evil. Other headlines this week: "Orthodox Video Silent on Reporting Sexual Abuse to Police," "Sotomayor's Religion, Ethnicity and Gender Reignite Affirmative Action Debate," "Terror Case Stirs Debate on Informants at Mosques" (relating to a synagogue bombing in Riverdale, N.Y.), "Elusive Common Ground" (an editorial on the murder of Dr. Tiller), "New Converso Rabbi Hopes to Help Others Follow His Jewish Path," "Why Straight People Go to Gay Synagogues and What We Can Learn of Them," "Mormons Fascinated by Potok," "Straight Talking from Gay Shuls," plus religious references in articles reporting that Israeli Jews are less pro-settlements on the West Bank than they once were. Any of these stories could prompt a comment in Sightings, but one stands out.

The one that elicits or should elicit debate begins on page one: "Popular Rabbi's Comment on Treatment of Arabs Show a Different Side of Chabad." Popular he is: Chabad Lubavitch Rabbi Manis Friedman who, according to writer Nathaniel Pepper, "has won the hearts of many unaffiliated Jews with his charismatic talks about love and God," is the man who attracted Bob Dylan into a relationship with Chabad. Here is what was behind the headline. In the "Ask the Rabbi" feature of Moment magazine, Friedman responded, when asked how Jews should treat their Arab neighbors: "The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way. Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children (and cattle)." Then there would be "no civilian casualties, no children in the line of fire, no false sense of righteousness, in fact, no war. I don't believe in Western morality. Living by Torah values will make us a light unto the nations who suffer defeat because of a disastrous morality of human invention."

Instantly, Jewish leaders who work for interfaith relations and "Western morality" criticized Friedman, while defenders of Chabad and Friedman's outlook rallied to support him. Of course, he later explained himself and criticized Moment. Also it was noted that Friedman was quoting a Torah text -- it's in the "Christian Bible," too -- commanding not only genocide but omnicide. And it is true, we have to locate the popular part of his movement in a larger context. Mordecai Spektor, publisher of American Jewish World, began to: "They are fundamentalists.They are our fundamentalists," Spektor wrote, and this language was representative of what such Chabad-Lubavitchers believe.

In such exchanges, mirror images of militant and extremist Muslims, one finds some refuge in the semi-secular, dialogically "human inventions" of "Western morality" that are fortunately reflected on many other pages of Forward any week.

Martin E. Marty's biography, current projects, upcoming events, publications, and contact information.
----------


In this month's Religion and Culture Web Forum essay, anthropologist and legal scholar Mateo Taussig-Rubbo examines "how the destruction of property and life seems to [generate] a new form of value," a value frequently identified as that of the "sacred." Focusing on the wreckage from and sites of the September 11 attacks, Taussig-Rubbo considers issues of property law and conceptions of sacrifice in an attempt to understand how this concept of sacrality comes to be, and what meanings it holds within American culture. Invited responses will follow from Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Kathryn Lofton, Jeremy Biles and Kristen Tobey.

----------

Sightings comes from the Martin Marty Center at the University of Chicago Divinity School.

Submissions policy

Sightings welcomes submissions of 500 to 750 words in length that seek to illuminate and interpret the forces of faith in a pluralist society. Previous columns give a good indication of the topical range and tone for acceptable essays. The editor also encourages new approaches to issues related to religion and public life.

Attribution

Columns may be quoted or republished in full, with attribution to the author of the column, Sightings, and the Martin Marty Center at the University of Chicago Divinity School.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Melissa Nann Burke published on June 16, 2009 12:02 PM.

Word of the day: Nimrod was the previous entry in this blog.

This is your brain on God is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.