That gay marriage thing

Not sure what to talk about today. If only there were some big news with religious implications like, oh, the president taking a stand on gay marriage.

Yeah, wow, I did not see that coming.

Seems like an odd thing to do right before a political election. Surely nobody favoring gay marriage was going to vote for Mitt Romney, so I am not sure what the president gains from this.

It may even cost him votes from some fence-sitters who believe the Bible is definitively against same-sex marriage.

Speaking of the Bible, it came up yesterday in a House debate on the issue when Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA) said the Bible is hardly the the go-to book for public policies. She quoted Leviticus 20:13, which says a man must be put to death if he has sex with another man.

“That’s the Old Testament,” protested Rep. Austin Scott (R-GA).

Here’s a roundup of interesting notes on the gay issue (courtesy of Religion News Service):

* There has been a lot of news in recent years of congregations leaving their mainline denominations over the gay issue. But it is usually because leadership is too liberal. Now comes a California church splitting from the U.S. Presbyterian Church because it isn’t liberal enough.

PCUSA approved the ordination of gay and lesbian lay persons in 2010. Locally, the Presbytery of Donegal, comprised of 58 congregations in York, Lancaster and Chester counties, adopted gay ordination last year. As a result of the move, several congregations in the area have split off as a result.

But the West Hollywood Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles claims PCUSA hasn’t done enough to embrace gays. The church plans to formally join the ranks of the more liberal United Church of Christ on Saturday.

“I can’t wait” said the Rev. Dan Smith, a gay pastor who has led the progressive congregation with about 57 members since the 1980s. “It’s like being released from an abusive relationship,” he told Reuters. “We’re ready to be set free.”

* Cardinal Timothy Dolan, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), issued the following statement on the president’s announcement:

“President Obama’s comments today in support of the redefinition of marriage are deeply saddening. As I stated in my public letter to the President on September 20, 2011, the Catholic Bishops stand ready to affirm every positive measure taken by the President and the Administration to strengthen marriage and the family. However, we cannot be silent in the face of words or actions that would undermine the institution of marriage, the very cornerstone of our society. The people of this country, especially our children, deserve better. Unfortunately, President Obama’s words today are not surprising since they follow upon various actions already taken by his Administration that erode or ignore the unique meaning of marriage. I pray for the President every day, and will continue to pray that he and his Administration act justly to uphold and protect marriage as the union of one man and one woman. May we all work to promote and protect marriage and by so doing serve the true good of all persons.”

About John Hilton

I grew up in Susquehanna County, Pa. and graduated Syracuse University with a dual degree in journalism/political science in 1998. After working for nearly three years for a weekly paper in upstate New York, I came to southcentral Pennsylvania. I spent 13 years as a reporter and editor for The Sentinel in Carlisle and joined the York Daily Record as religion reporter in September 2011.
This entry was posted in Arts and media, Catholicism, Celebrities, Culture wars, Politics, Pop Culture and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to That gay marriage thing

  1. Ah C says:

    If gay marriage is ok, why not make polygamy, incest, or pedophilia, OK?

    And all of aforementioned in the name of ‘LOVE’ will justify them all?

    Do the “ends” justify the “means” at any cost?

    Are gays really being honest with themselves and others in “coming out of the closet”? Why the need for gay “pride” in the first place decades ago?

    Perhaps someone can explain why they want to shame others for their hate or homophobia when they themselves needed to advertise and promote their own “pride” well before anyone knew about gay pride?

    ONE LAST POINT/QUESTION.
    Doesn’t the medical community recommend that you, “Wash your hands after you go to the bathroom.”?

    Yet, now there are some in the medical community that now say it’s OK to “Sleep with the waste that gets flushed down in the toilet?” and that it’s possible to live a perfectly normal life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>