In an edition of Sightings from last week, a federal judge from Illinois dissects a legal brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court from a diverse group of religious organizations arguing a moral case for why the should stop the sentencing of juveniles convicted of non-homicide offenses to life without the possibility of parole.
The groups make a claim "rarely heard in contemporary culture, that the duty of a judge, and of a society imposing judgment, is to make adequate provision for ... values" of mercy, forgiveness and passion, writes U.S. District Judge Joan Gottschall.

