Unraveling the Hummer vs. Prius cost/pollution analysis

The resources needed and pollution created to manufacture a hybrid could be worse than the overall cost of producing and running a non-hybrid
A recent article has been floating around started by CWA marketing detailing how GM’s Hummer only cost about $1.95 per mile to put on the road, while the Prius $3.25 per mile. The idea is that building a Toyota Prius causes more environmental damage than a Hummer that it is on the road for three times longer than a Prius. It’s assumed the Hummer will be around for over 300,000 miles and the Prius 100,000 miles.
Some other things to consider… the nickel in the batteries

Building a Toyota Prius causes more environmental damage than a Hummer that is on the road for three times longer than a Prius. As already noted, the Prius is partly driven by a battery which contains nickel. The nickel is mined and smelted at a plant in Sudbury, Ontario. This plant has caused so much environmental damage to the surrounding environment that NASA has used the ‘dead zone’ around the plant to test moon rovers. The area around the plant is devoid of any life for miles.
The plant is the source of all the nickel found in a Prius’ battery and Toyota purchases 1,000 tons annually. Dubbed the Superstack, the plague-factory has spread sulfur dioxide across northern Ontario, becoming every environmentalist’s nightmare.
“The acid rain around Sudbury was so bad it destroyed all the plants and the soil slid down off the hillside,” said Canadian Greenpeace energy-coordinator David Martin during an interview with Mail, a British-based newspaper.
All of this would be bad enough in and of itself; however, the journey to make a hybrid doesn’t end there. The nickel produced by this disastrous plant is shipped via massive container ship to the largest nickel refinery in Europe. From there, the nickel hops over to China to produce ‘nickel foam.’ From there, it goes to Japan. Finally, the completed batteries are shipped to the United States, finalizing the around-the-world trip required to produce a single Prius battery. Are these not sounding less and less like environmentally sound cars and more like a farce?
Wait, I haven’t even got to the best part yet.
When you pool together all the combined energy it takes to drive and build a Toyota Prius, the flagship car of energy fanatics, it takes almost 50 percent more energy than a Hummer – the Prius’s arch nemesis.
Through a study by CNW Marketing called “Dust to Dust,” the total combined energy is taken from all the electrical, fuel, transportation, materials (metal, plastic, etc) and hundreds of other factors over the expected lifetime of a vehicle. The Prius costs an average of $3.25 per mile driven over a lifetime of 100,000 miles – the expected lifespan of the Hybrid.
The Hummer, on the other hand, costs a more fiscal $1.95 per mile to put on the road over an expected lifetime of 300,000 miles. That means the Hummer will last three times longer than a Prius and use less combined energy doing it. clubs.ccsu.edu/recorder/editorial

Of course you have to figure out emissions and fuel cost. If the Prius uses four times less fuel (and drastically reduced carbon emissions), even if it lasts one third the time, it has less impact from emissions.
And really, how many Hummers are on the road after 300,000 miles, after taking into account accidents and owners just not driving them 300,000 miles. How many Hummers are parked while Prius’ are running a daily commute.
The more you read about this comparison, the more confusing it gets. There are far better ecological choices than the Prius or the Hummer – like walking and riding your bike
It does, however, shed light on the environmental costs to be considered in vehicle production

engadget.com

About Paul Kuehnel

Paul Kuehnel has worked for the York Daily Record/Sunday News since 1984. Follow him on Twitter @paulkuehnel.
This entry was posted in All posts from the start, Hybrid, MPG, Oil Machine/politics. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Unraveling the Hummer vs. Prius cost/pollution analysis

  1. KenBob says:

    Hummer: consistently ranked lowest in reliability.
    Prius: consistently ranked highest in reliability.
    Hmm…so CWA Marketing thinks the Hummer will last 200k miles more than the Prius…uh, yeah. Newsflash CWA: the Prius battery is engineered to last over 10 years. Even if someone drives a typical 15,000 miles a year, that’s at least 150k miles.
    Sorry, but for all we know, CWA’s marketing “study” was funded by GM to increase slagging Hummer sales– I don’t know of too many reputable scientific environmental studies that are done by marketing firms.

  2. paul kuehnel says:

    CNW marketing appears to be a well paid data cruncher of the U.S. automotive industry, so I take alot of their analysis as a hand up to their gravy train; though they do come up with some stuff to think about.
    Key word in CNW Marketing Research, “Marketing”
    Nice to see you again KB

  3. KenBob says:

    That explains it. I wouldn’t trust them as far as I can throw one of their “green” Hummers.
    Nice to be back, thanks. My router died a few weeks back and I’ve been too busy with work to replace it –much less surf the Net.

  4. Wayne says:

    Might want to read the article. The point was never mentioned to go and by a Hummer, that was just a drastic comparison. The point is a high mileage all fuel car will have less impact such as the Civic or Cooper or GM Evo. Even Greenpeace acknownledges it. Lastly the batteries are made to last 10 years not the car.

  5. Nerm says:

    emm.. lets think about the life of the battery here, from mining the nickel to produce the battery and what to do after? Huge environmental effects. Even if the battery last that long, it still causes damage before and after use!

  6. jeremy says:

    gawd this old lie again. Sudbury may have been a moonscape 40 years ago but not now. This article is like blaming GM now for pollution that blighted detroit back in the 1950s

  7. eco-nfused says:

    Hmmm…?
    It seems like there is no way to win these days…
    today everything pollutes and destroys the environment like yesterday when everything gave you cancer…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>