Buckingham seesaws on the stand

| | Comments (11)

Here's what I wrote about the Dover Panda Trial about Thursday's testimony...

By MIKE ARGENTO

HARRISBURG — It was surely one of the most anticipated moments in the history of federal jurisprudence, the appearance, finally, of former Dover Area School Board member Bill Buckingham at the Dover Panda Trial.

And it did not disappoint. It was, in the truest sense of the word, unbelievable.

Really.

Unbelievable.

At the onset of his stay on the witness stand, Buckingham raised his right hand and swore, or affirmed, to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Then, for the record, he stated his name.

“William Buckingham.�

By the time he left the stand, six hours later, I almost expected the judge to ask him for a photo ID to make sure he was indeed William Buckingham.

A telling moment came when he was asked about how the Dover Area High School had acquired 60 copies of the book “Of Pandas and People,� a brilliantly dumb book that promotes the idea of intelligent design.

In a deposition given in January, he said he didn’t know how the district got the books. He said he didn’t know who donated the books. He said he didn’t ask because he didn’t want to know. He said he didn’t know who donated the money to buy the books.

So, during his testimony Thursday, Steve Harvey, one of the lawyers for the plaintiffs, asked Buckingham about the books and how the money was raised to buy them. He specifically asked Buckingham whether he raised the money at his church.

He said he hadn’t.

Then, he said he had.

Then, he said he hadn’t.

He said he stood before the congregation one Sunday morning and said “there was a need� for money to buy “Of Pandas and People� and if anyone wanted to give, they could.

“But I didn’t ask anyone for money,� he said.

Harvey asked him whether he took up a collection at his church, Harmony Grove Community Church.

“Not as such,� Buckingham said.

So the lawyer asked him whether he got in front of the congregation and asked for donations.

“I didn’t,� Buckingham said.

He paused.

“I’m sorry, I did say that, but there was more to it,� he said.

Anyway, he collected the money — wherever it came from — and then he wrote a check for $850 to Donald Bonsell, father of then-school board President Alan Bonsell.

But previously, when asked by the lawyer about who donated the books, he said he didn’t know.

“Mr. Buckingham, you lied to me at your deposition .¤.¤. isn’t that true?� Harvey asked.

“How so?� Buckingham responded.

It went on for a while before Judge John E. Jones III told Harvey to move on.

“You made your point very effectively,� the judge said.

Earlier, Harvey had made an even more effective point.

Buckingham said he never read about his adventures on the school board in the newspapers and never talked to anyone about them. He also said he never mentioned creationism at school board meetings or in the press or anywhere, for that matter.

So at the time the board was talking about creationism, Buckingham granted an interview to a Fox 43 news reporter. I guess he forgot about that new-fangled invention, videotape.

On the tape, which you can see at www.ydr.com/mmedia/multi/528, Buckingham, wearing the same lapel pin he wore in court Thursday, said he wanted to balance evolution in the classroom with something else, “such as creationism.�

Oops.

He said that the reporter “ambushed� him and that he was “like a deer in the headlights of a car� and that the newspapers were all reporting that he and the board were talking about creationism and that he thought to himself, “Don’t say creationism.�

Double oops.

It was like he had a Homer Simpson moment. He was thinking “Don’t say creationism. Don’t say creationism. Don’t say creationism.� And then he opens his yap and says “creationism.�

D’oh!

And to compound the prevarication, he said he was thinking about something the newspapers reported — something he didn’t read or talk to anybody about.

It went on like that all day. He’d say he voted for buying a new biology book. Then, he said he voted against it. He said he thought intelligent design was a scientific theory. But he said he didn’t know what intelligent design was. He said he wasn’t the force behind the board adopting intelligent design and then, confronted with what he said, under oath, previously, he’d say maybe he was.

He said a lot of things, and then he’d say a lot of things that weren’t exactly what he had said to begin with.

And then, he attributed his spotty, selective and just plain weird memory to his OxyContin addiction.

Unbelievable.
----

Mike Argento, whose column appears Mondays and Thursdays in Living and Sundays in Viewpoints, can be reached at 771-2046 or at mike@ydr.com. Read more Argento columns at ydr.com/mike.

11 Comments

Amazing. Simply amazing. I bet Steve Harvey did a nice little victory dance after that exchange. You simply can't ask for a better witness than that. They don't even write witnesses that inane into Law & Order scripts.

Thank you Mike for giving us a lively ringside seat at this circus of clowns. If clowns are good for one thing, it is a laugh.

From the sound of things, Harvey has scored big points on Behe (his definition of a 'theory' includes Astrology), Nilsen (noting Bonsell & creationism), and now Buckingham. It also sounds as if the Judge is sympathetic to Harvey's painstaking efforts to detail a pro-Creationist agenda. But is this a trial by jury? And if so, how do they seem to be taking all of this?

This is not a trial by jury; the judge will make a ruling. And I so glad since the defendants couldn't present themselves in a worse light.

Note: I am not now, nor have I ever been related to Nilsen. He must be a Swede. If not, he's a Dane like me but doesn't know how to spell our name.

Perhaps Buckingham needs to balance his OxyContin with marijuana....

Every day my wife and I thank God that, when we relocated to the York area one year ago, we didn't buy a home anywhere near those knuckleheads in Dover.

I just read that board member Heather Geesey relied solely on the recommendations of Alan Bonsell and William Buckingham -- and I quote -- "They said it was a scientific thing" [meaning I.D.]

Then when asked if she ignored the only people in people in the school district with a scientific background (the science teachers), she said "YES."

Unbelievable.

I know it has to end sometime, but I surely am going to miss your coverage of the trial. I send all your stuff to my group of "Darwin's Bulldogs." We are winning, aren't we? What do you know about the judge?

Judge Jones seems to be a classic jurist. His remarks during the trial indicate he's not swayed by the defense. Remember, in recent weeks someone mentioned future trials could be held on this matter and Jones muttered "Not on my docket", sort of tipping his hand. He's allowing the clowns to proceed so appeals will fail (sorry Mike, I know you said you're scared of clowns).

All I can say is this - for all of you up there in PA...one day there will be a higher judge...and you will stand before him...and you will be judged based on your comments/judgements/and etc....and he will let you remember this day...and "Blessed be the name of the Lord God almighty!!!"

All I can say is this - for all of you up there in PA...one day there will be a higher judge...and you will stand before him...and you will be judged based on your comments/judgements/and etc....and he will let you remember this day...and "Blessed be the name of the Lord God almighty!!!"

Well, let's hope the Dover school board takes that to heart...

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Scott Fisher published on October 28, 2005 8:06 AM.

Life in the Big Tent... was the previous entry in this blog.

ID: Out with a Big Bang is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.