Tom DeLay as Jesus? Oh - my - God

| | Comments (7)

MIKE
ARGENTO

Alleged money launderer and former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay was on “Good Morning America� Tuesday, talking about how those gosh-darned liberal Democrats were driving him from public disservice when he uttered a few words comparing himself to Jesus.


First off, accusing liberal Democrats of driving him from office seems a little far-fetched. The Democrats have a hard time organizing lunch — particularly since all the well-heeled lobbyists provide free lunch only to Republicans because they’re the ones with power — so it’s hard to imagine them organizing a campaign to throw the little bug killer from Texas out of office.

Secondly, Tom DeLay and Jesus?

Really?

I was prepared to conduct a comparison. Both were brought down by disloyal aides — Jesus by Judas, and DeLay by former staffers and golfing buddies who are squawking to the federales. Both had problems with Jews; Judas was Jewish and so is disgraced lobbyist/convict Jack Abramoff. But the comparison had already been done and has been circulating on the Internet for some time.

According to that comparison:

Jesus was a carpenter; DeLay is The Hammer.

Jesus had 12 disciples; DeLay has a legal defense fund.

Jesus taught self-control; DeLay sold pest control.

Jesus said, “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the Earth�: DeLay bestows blessings upon the rich for they shall pay no inheritance tax.

Jesus healed the sick; DeLay helped cut Medicaid funding.

Jesus rolled back the rock; DeLay crawled out from under one.

But it pretty much ends there. When you think about it, there is no real comparison. Jesus threw the moneychangers out of the temple. DeLay invited them in and took their campaign contributions. Jesus helped the poor. DeLay, yeah, right. Jesus taught us to love our enemies and to turn the other cheek. DeLay taught his disciples to hate their enemies and kick them in their personal regions at every given opportunity. Jesus was the most loving, decent, honest, generous, caring human being to ever grace the planet. DeLay barely qualifies as human.

And I’m not even going to talk about their hair. OK, I am. Jesus, in most depictions, has lots of it, and DeLay looks like he has the carcass of a dead squirrel on his head.

The religious comparison is ridiculous, though it was invited by DeLay himself by comparing his self-destruction, brought about by his own hubris and lust for power, with the ultimate sacrifice made by Jesus on Calvary.

The parallels are non-existent.

If you want to do a comparison between DeLay and anybody, you have to think of a time and place closer to home.

You have to think of New Jersey.

Tom DeLay is much more like Tony Soprano.

He’s essentially a mob boss.

All of the stories about DeLay’s resignation focused on his indictment on money laundering charges and associated campaign finance violations and his ties to Abramoff. Abramoff, the stories all said, was a buddy of DeLay’s and channeled campaign contributions to DeLay and his associates. And three of DeLay’s former aides have all been implicated in the Abramoff scandal — and at least two of them are singing to the feds.

That is like describing Watergate as a third-rate burglary.

What DeLay has done is presided over the selling of the U.S. government to the highest bidder.

Want a law passed? You have to get a lobbyist or a political action committee to grease the tracks with some tribute to the bosses. Want a highway project? Have to pay the piper. Want to have a law that protects your industry — pharmaceutical industry, I’m looking at you — from being sued? Pony up. Have members of your party that might not vote with you? Bully them and threaten to cut off their campaign cash.

And the great thing is, it’s all sort of legal.

The mob’s genius was the development of Vegas more than 50 years ago, institutionalizing and legitimizing its previously illicit business. DeLay’s genius was institutionalizing the way money talks in politics.

He had some help. One of his allies in this battle was our own U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum. Santorum met regularly with lobbying firms to make sure they were hiring Republicans and were supporting Republicans. After the Abramoff scandal came to light, Santorum said he would stop meeting with lobbyists in the Capitol.

Of course, he left himself a loophole. He still meets with the lobbyists — the same day and time as before — but three blocks from the Capitol building.

This is the kind of sleaze that DeLay represents. He turned the Republican Party and the Republican Congress into a kind of big crime family.

And the people being ripped off are you and me.

Every day, Congress sells out our interest to the highest bidder. Look at the Medicare drug plan. It’s a mess and senior citizens and taxpayers are being ripped off. Seniors aren’t saving much money and the cost of the program is turning out to be a lot more than they said it would.

Someone’s benefiting, though. Big pharmaceutical and insurance companies. How do you think they got that kind of clout? The old-fashioned way, they bought it.

And who was the capo of this enterprise?

Tom DeLay.

Maybe things will change now. Maybe Congress will come to its senses and pass real lobbying reform that forbids lobbyists from buying access to lawmakers for the price of lunch, or a trip to the South Pacific, or a round of golf at St. Andrews, or campaign contributions, or donations to fake charities.

Who am I kidding?

That’ll happen probably at the same time Tom DeLay starts walking on water.

Mike Argento, whose column appears Mondays and Thursdays in Living and Sundays in Viewpoints, can be reached at 771-2046 or at mike@ydr.com.

7 Comments

If there is ever a person who has "evolutionized out of some primordial mud," it's Tom Delay himself.

You could not complete a single sentence without jounalistic latitude or better, liberal bias. (public disservice). You are an editorialist, not a jounalist. I guess that make you one who does not tell the truth journalist.

Good morning, George Van Valkenburg, and welcome to Journalism 101.

Newspapers not only are home to objective reporting of news (a form of journalism), but to the op/ed column - also journalism. The op stands for opinion, and the ed stands for editorial.

What you're reading here is an 'opinion' piece, which, without some kind of personal bias, wouldn't really be much of an opinion, would it?

Welcome to the internet!

I have to disagree, Matt. Opinion/editorial articles should be expected to use logic and good reasoning/argumentative skills. I would classify this article more as "entertainment." Unfortunately, many people are more persuaded by humor than they are by good arguments that may require some thought.

Hmmm. Can we maybe agree on infotainment? While there is name-calling at first in the piece, it does lead to some observations on the system. Humor is sometimes necessary to trick people into learning.

Take, for instance, The Daily Show. You won't get younger people to sit and watch Meet the Press, but they get exposed to a lot of clever stuff via The Daily Show.

Now, is the Daily Show actually journalism? I don't think that's even debatable. It's totally a spoof, but they sneak in both facts and opinion, and interview some really interesting people while they're at it. (And some not so interesting people from time to time.)

Likewise, Argento's columns are both entertaining and informative. I think it's one of the strongest points of this blog. His posts on the Dover Panda Trial got more comments than anything else posted here. Rote journalism is important, don't get me wrong... but to say that Mike Argento is an editorialist and make a big fuss out of it is a little like getting upset at Shakespeare for using dirty words in his plays. I mean, really, if you're complaining about that, do you know enough on the topic to have a valid opinion?

Also, to say that Argento can't tell the truth because he likes to point out Tom DeLay's shortcomings... that's looney.

In the interest of full disclosure, I like Mike Argento's columns... as if you couldn't tell, what with my comparing them to Shakespeare and Jon Stewart, right?

Mr. Argento fulfills his role at the paper and does it well - entertains those who are looking for a liberal and humorous slant on the news and aggravates the rest of us. I've lived in many areas and have found that local newspapers often have a columnist who fills this role.

It's a sad comment on society when a news article has to "trick people into learning." The problem is that such learning is often deceitful learning. For instance, a recent article talked about some strange philosophy and linked this philosophy with intelligent design. The assumed conclusion is that if this philosophy is weird, so is intelligent design. Or, those that believe in intelligent design also have strange philosophies. So, somehow after reading this column, readers will be less likely to take intelligent design seriously. Bad logic.

Another example..."if you're complaining about that, do you know enough on the topic to have a valid opinion?" Your quote. That's attacking the person and not the argument.

Curses, I'm going to have to brush up on my rhetorical theory now, as my half-wit arguments are getting called out!

Now, on the topic of strange philosophy, I believe the column you speak (type) of was about Pastafarianism, or the followers of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, and how that was compared to Intelligent Design.

I disagree that the -conclusion- is that ID is weird just because Pastafarianism is weird. Certainly, there is a -comparison- drawn between the two: in intelligent design, it is postulated that some greater being conjured up everything as we know it. The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster does not dispute this... in fact, they simply state that this higher being is the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

By following up on that infotainment column via a google search on "spaghetti monster," I found the official COTFSM website at www.venganza.org, where this more specific Intelligent Design theory is explained in further detail, straight fom the source.

Inadvertently, (okay, maybe not so inadvertently) this illustrates the absurdity of trying to pretend that Intelligent Design is a science.

I agree, it is sad comment on society when a news article has to "trick people into learning," but if thats what it takes, and if it works, awesome. It's kind of like shaping vitamin pills into characters from the Flintstones, but perhaps more effective. Or... or... Bill Nye the Science Guy! Kids like Bill Nye way more than sitting through science class.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Scott Fisher published on April 7, 2006 4:52 PM.

Wake up and read this! was the previous entry in this blog.

Talk about strange bedfellows... is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.