N. Codorus residents question access to tapes of meetings

| | Comments (0)
Last night's North Codorus Township meeting included some discussion about whether the public has access to the township's tape recordings of meetings. (They do; tapes of meetings are public records). At the meeting, some residents complained about the township's policy of destroying the tapes, saying that in the past, minutes have been inaccurate and that residents ought to be able to hear the tapes.

This morning, township solicitor William H. Poole Jr. clarified the municpality's procedure, saying recordings should be destroyed within 24 hours of the approval of the official minutes; once the minutes are approved, he told Daily Record/Sunday News correspondent Teresa McMinn, there is no point in keeping the tapes.

It's likely the residents would say there is a point -- that they could use the tape to compare with the official minutes and see if there were any differences.

This discussion raises a couple of questions, which McMinn is pursuing:


-Can residents make copies of the tapes? If they can, then the schedule by which the township destroys the tapes doesn't affect whether residents can use the tapes to compare with the officially approved minutes.The township's fee schedule for public records seems to leave open the possibility of making a copy of a tape (see No. 6), but doesn't address it explicitly. Poole did note that residents can make their own recordings of the meetings.

-If residents can't make copies of the tapes, is 24 hours enough time to allow someone to check the tape against the officially approved minutes?

Has anyone else  -- resident, or municipality employee, or lawyer -- had anything to do with listening to tapes of public meetings? Share your story if you will. Meanwhile, we'll let you know how the North Codorus issue turns out.


Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Scott Blanchard published on March 18, 2009 1:47 PM.

Update: Fighting open records -- to the max was the previous entry in this blog.

Open records office director weighs in on new law is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.