By JESSICA GRIMM
On Feb. 16, Mr. Mark Stickel was found dead in his classroom at my high school. It’s now a week later, the school is trying to return back to normal, but some things are still causing controversy within West York Area High School.
Why did Mrs. May, the principal, and Dr. Lonardi, the superintendent, not tell the students what was going on? I understand that the administration had a lot to deal with, but keeping the students in a “Code Blue Lockdown,‿ ignorant of the day’s events, probably wasn’t the best solution.
Counselors have been at the school to help students cope with grief.
It has been decided, however, that one of the most therapeutic things for many students has been somewhat banned. The banned method: writing.
Poems that express students’ feelings about the suicide cannot be published in The Inkwell, a literary magazine in the school.
Articles cannot be published in The Paw Print, our school newspaper.
Why is it that students are expected to share their feelings with counselors (complete strangers), but cannot write to share feelings with their peers, who probably have a better understanding of one another’s feelings?
One reason given is that doing such things will glorify the act of suicide and perhaps cause others to do the same as Mr. Stickel.
I find this argument to be absurd. Those who want to write the poems and the articles want to pay tribute to Mr. Stickel’s life, and want to get sad feelings off their chests.
It seems that many are quick to criticize Mr. Stickel’s choice to die inside of the school, but I think that the resulting actions of the administration are worse.
Jessica Grimm is a student at West York Area High School and a member of the Teen Takeover staff.