They are a chain of lingerie stores.

Aren't they supposed to be sexy? And the sexier, the better, right?

What the heck is "too sexy?"

How the heck is it different from "ultrafeminine?"

As a woman, isn't it sexy to be ultrafeminine?

I'm sorry, Vickie's, but I'm confused.

Your core products are made to help women feel more feminine and ultra sexy. What's wrong with that?

As far as your earnings go, they could be hurting, like everyone else's, because consumers are spending more money on gas and groceries, and have less to spend on skimpy, frilly things that make Saturday nights more interesting.

Perhaps I'm thinking of the wrong brand, but I thought your "core" was about women, helping them feel sexy and confident with their sexuality, and giving them the products to get them there.

Or, maybe I'm overthinking this one, and the CEO just needed to say something to cover her rump (she certainly can't use their undies) over the company's (wait for it. . . ) skimpy earnings. (I know. I crack myself up, too.)

However, there's nothing wrong with sex or being sexy.

Victoria's Secret just has to figure out how to sell more goods in a "difficult" (read - recessed) economy, and stop blaming sexy.

Any thoughts on this one, dear readers?